There is no need to resort to a reinvention of the wheel, er dining table and chair, for a 6'-2" height. If you are the only person sitting and eating, then you can make it whatever, but then you subject your guests to the same dimensions you have imposed on the designs.
I find that people never complain about the height, but they do like to cross their legs at long dining events. This eliminates an apron, making for design differences, but greatly improves comfort.
That and keeping the legs/top supports out of the way of diner's legs and feet would be the much higher priority than the height change.
When I was green, back in 1980, and needed a family dining table, I made one at 31" - 1" taller than usual. I am - was - 6'2". my thought, like yours , was this was a better height for me.
Well, for the next 39 years, almost every time I sit at it, running in the background, is the fact that it is too tall and I feel I may bump my chin on it. I need to turn it over and whack the legs off, but have not done it. Yet. Visitors mention it, family doesn't like it (even though they are mostly tall), and since there is a 4" apron, it also does not provide enough room under the table for crossing legs, etc.
Form Vs Function ; it is an old discussion....